Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Slate Fork operations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Slate Fork operations

    During the 1960s and into the early 1980s, Southern's Appalachia Division was timetable/train order territory, and the few photos I've seen with signals from that era were ABS at best.

    So the Slate Fork Branch also operates with a combination of modes: TT/TO and Yard Limits. Southern's Slate Fork Mine Run operates between Andover Yard and Koester VA as an extra; ditto for the L&N Switcher job between Loyall KY and Koester.

    Once arriving at Koester, Yard Limits takes effect. That saves crews from the necessity of flagging to protect the rear and head end when their train has stopped. It also saves the dispatchers (me in both cases) from having to issue Form 19 orders for movement over the 4.3 miles or so of joint track.

    TT/TO ops also presents a different challenge: It's the white flags denoting a train is an extra. Attaching teensy white flags to an N scale diesel just doesn't seem practical. But I'll figure out how to do it.

    Slate Fork Branch Timetable:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Slate Fork Timetable JPEG.jpg Views:	1 Size:	144.1 KB ID:	34548
    Last edited by Paul S.; 2 weeks ago.
    Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

    Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

    #2
    Do you have an employee time table for the Appalachia Division? Usually things like these mine runs had schedules and were regular trains, no extras.

    Southern tended to put everything in the ETT, but with a few exceptions, there was no expectation that any of them would run anywhere near their scheduled times.
    Tim Rumph
    Lancaster, SC

    Comment


      #3
      I do have ETTs for the Appalachia Division via a book, Tim. I seem to recall one mine run (St. Charles Branch? Dan Bourque will know.) was a second-class train.
      Last edited by Paul S.; 05-19-2021, 06:57 AM.
      Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

      Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

      Comment


        #4
        Wouldn't your diesel locomotive have class lights instead of flags? I seem to recall that not very many flags existed on diesel locomotives while running as extras. Steam on the other hand had white flags.
        Follow along on Facebook as well.
        https://www.facebook.com/groups/424898032713171/

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by craigtownsend View Post
          Wouldn't your diesel locomotive have class lights instead of flags? I seem to recall that not very many flags existed on diesel locomotives while running as extras. Steam on the other hand had white flags.
          I wish that were the case with the Southern, Craig.

          Here's a link to a photo from 1980 showing SD40-2s with white flags a-flyin': https://appalachianrailroadmodeling....3188oldfortnc/

          The old school was still a good school. And as I understand it, the Appalachian Division was Old School.

          But I hope I'm not painting with too wide a brush, either.
          Last edited by Paul S.; 05-19-2021, 01:28 PM.
          Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

          Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Tim R View Post
            Do you have an employee time table for the Appalachia Division? Usually things like these mine runs had schedules and were regular trains, no extras.

            Southern tended to put everything in the ETT, but with a few exceptions, there was no expectation that any of them would run anywhere near their scheduled times.
            Tim and craigtownsend and DanB, I was reminded after perusing through my copy Appalachian Coal Mines and Railroads: Virginia that the Southern in 1984 was still running second-class trains #60 and #61 up the St. Charles Branch west of Andover, Va., daily except Sundays. This was a mine run, and its presence as such on the ETT was more than just "informational only."

            So this might be the solution I need. Rejiggering the Slate Fork Branch timetable sounds a lot easier than adding/removing white flags.

            I'll have to do some more research, but I am assuming #60/#61 was second-class all the way to/from Andover Yard? Not an extra on the mainline, then becoming a second-class train on the St. Charles Branch?
            Last edited by Paul S.; 05-20-2021, 04:36 AM.
            Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

            Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

            Comment


              #7
              Paul, I believe you're right about the mine runs on the Appalachia Division, though I can't seem to find my timetable at the moment. Even though most of them ran nearly daily, were called at the same time, and had regular names, they weren't on the timetable and ran as extras. Even the single train each way on the St. Charles Branch was, I believe, the train that shuttled loads and empties between the big yard at Appalachia/Andover and the tiny yard at St. Charles--the mine runs out of St. Charles appear also to have been handled as extras. The only other train on the line that's in the timetable was the L&N's CV Local from Pennington with trackage rights. I'm guessing the only reason either one was on the timetable was to provide a little deconfliction between the two railroads.

              Comment


              • Paul S.
                Paul S. commented
                Editing a comment
                Thanks for the much-appreciated info, Dan! Yes, I'm with you about 60/61 between St. Charles and Andover. It seemed to be the outlier, as it were, in an operating plan dominated by extras.

                Tim R. has another take on things below.

              #8
              Paul, I think your thinking mirror's the Southern's. All of those mine runs and locals being regular trains saved the dispatcher time since he didn't need to write running orders for them. Also, as a regular train, many of those branches included wording like this:

              Trains between A and F do not need
              to protect against following extra trains
              unless directed to by train order.

              You also need to pay attention to which way the superior direction is. In 1974, notes like this were common.

              No. 93 is superior to No. 92
              Lenoir to Oyama.

              Later they started playing games with class, making the earlier train in the inferior direction second class and the later train in the superior direction third class.

              Another way to handle it is to put the while branch as yard limits, then any train or engine can use it at any time, observing yard speed, being able to stop in half of sight distance not exceeding 20 mph.

              As it happens, Nos. 60 and 61 were the local trains between Spencer and Morganton on the part of the Southern that I'm modeling. There were daily except Sunday trains that would go out one day and back the next. They'd meet somewhere in the middle. They were scheduled to meet in Catawba, but I doubt that happened much, and there was no siding there. These were likely to be far behind their schedules and they probably had orders on where to meet.
              Tim Rumph
              Lancaster, SC

              Comment


              • Paul S.
                Paul S. commented
                Editing a comment
                I'm thinking that just for sanity's sake in 1:160 scale, and also in keeping with the Appalachian Division's practices, Tim, I'd better consider the Slate Fork Mine Run an extra until it reaches Slate Fork Junction and the crew signs the train register. Then white flags could come off and Yard Limits rules come into play. I like that idea of yours a lot. Maybe not Southern poker accordinging to Brosnan, but it's appealing.

                And that reminds me -- the branch is in Yard Limits for a fair chunk, which I neglected to put in the timetable. Bad on me. Well, no harm in moving the sign further west to the junction.

                EDIT: I wonder if operating practices precluded having to sign a train register if Yard Limits were in effect?
                Last edited by Paul S.; 05-24-2021, 02:26 PM.

              #9
              These were likely to be far behind their schedules and they probably had orders on where to meet.
              That being the irony of running a regular train to save on train orders, if its late, you still need to write train orders to cover opposing trains.

              Trains between A and F do not need
              to protect against following extra trains
              unless directed to by train order.
              What that basically does is put up a fence where the dispatcher cannot run any following extras on the branch without additional train orders.

              EDIT: I wonder if operating practices precluded having to sign a train register if Yard Limits were in effect?
              Yard limits have no effect on register requirements unless it states something specific in the timetable or special instructions. I find that modelers include more register stations than real railroads. Railroads often used form V train orders or had a form V equivalent on their clearances that could be used in lieu of a register.

              For example on my P&R branch I can't find any evidence of train register at any station on the branch, even thought trains originated, terminated and there were three smaller branches that broke off the line I model. (note: on the P&R any line other than the route from Pottsville, PA to New York, via Philadelphia was a "branch" regardless of traffic level or tonnage).

              Another way to handle it is to put the while branch as yard limits, then any train or engine can use it at any time, observing yard speed, being able to stop in half of sight distance not exceeding 20 mph.
              Minor point, that is a later version of yard limits, earlier version read "stop short of" rather than "within half the range of vision of". That change happened sometime in the 1980's generally. Also in yard limits, first class trains can go max speed and inferior trains and engines have to clear the time of regular trains. Doesn't sound like there are any first class trains, but that's part of the rule too.
              Last edited by dave1905 (RIP); 05-30-2021, 08:30 AM.

              Comment


                #10
                Thanks for the insights, Dave. Now to sync it with the nuances of Southern's TT/TO practices on the Appalachian Division in 1978.
                Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

                Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

                Comment


                  #11
                  I'm guessing the only reason either one was on the timetable was to provide a little deconfliction between the two railroads.
                  Generally what that means is that it was a regular train on the L&N timetable and so remained a regular train on the SOU timetable. The L&N would consider it a regular train across the entire trip of the train, having it a regular train, then not a regular train, then back to a regular train would cause all sorts of confusion from the standpoint of the L&N.

                  Comment


                    #12
                    So, taking a cue from DanB, who's modeling the Southern's St. Charles Branch, just a few "hollers" over from the Slate Fork Branch, I've put together a combination timetable/job description/switch list/track schematic.

                    The whole thing fits on a standard sheet of paper, and is printed on both sides, and once folded in half is easy to work with. The only paperwork a crew will have in hand is this, their clearance card, and Form 19 order(s). Pretty simple!

                    The "tilted" look is due to my scanner.

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	rmr10001.jpg Views:	2 Size:	107.8 KB ID:	34550 Click image for larger version  Name:	rmr20001~2.jpg Views:	2 Size:	89.9 KB ID:	34551
                    Last edited by Paul S.; 2 weeks ago.
                    Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

                    Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

                    Comment


                    • Russ C
                      Russ C commented
                      Editing a comment
                      That's very interesting Paul. I'd done something similar a little while ago but mine has train consists and spotting (shunting) locations as well.
                      Being at the end of a branchline is just one giant 'loads in/empties out' operation but you having more branchline, have more industry scope.

                    • Paul S.
                      Paul S. commented
                      Editing a comment
                      Your take on it sounds very handy too, Russ C.

                      The one concession I made was with the track schematic. Typically, these are drawn with "east" at the right and "west" at the left. I opted to draw mine as an operator would see the layout, with "east" (compass south) on the left, to help make.things a bit easier.

                    • Russ C
                      Russ C commented
                      Editing a comment
                      My layout and ops has more in common with your former British layout being a terminus.
                      What am I talking about? Don't have an operational layout, lotsa timber, much of it screwed together....

                    #13
                    You're spot on, Russ C , and you're getting there!
                    Southern Railway Slate Fork Branch: https://realisticmodelrailroading.ne...-fork-branch-n

                    Old magazines can still be fresh sources of hobby information!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X